IO advertizing MG42/M53 Parts Kits w/Receiver?

[gdmoore28]

Anybody seen the IO internet PDF copy of their catalog in which they are advertizing MG42/M53 parts kits including the receiver and deactivated barrels? They give no other information or prices. Has anybody talked to them to get the scoop on pricing?

http://www.ioinc.us/WebCatalog.pdf

I wonder if anybody else has these on hand yet?

GeeDeeEmm

[Bil]

No prices on any of that stuff-I think they keep you looking and hoping,when you check with them they will be 'out of stock'.It saves having to re-do the catalog,and looks good in there! ---bil

[URAR1004]

They've been pulling that stunt for a few years now! Who knows why???

[Cpt_Kirks]

Is there another thread covering this issue? I think somebody mentioned it may be a carry over from an old catalog or something like that.

[ptk28164]

spoke to someone there this morning, she was very vague and all she knew is that sometime in 2008 some maybe available, i think it's a dead end!!!

[Cpt_Kirks]

spoke to someone there this morning, she was very vague and all she knew is that sometime in 2008 some maybe available, i think it's a dead end!!!

Oh, so they gave you a "Centerfire Systems" type answer!

[smokinggun]

I talked to them two weeks ago. They said to call back in four weeks and they will know more. Take it for what its worth.

[FKpt.Fritz]

just talked to david moses

here is emal.

Dear sir,

This will not happen until next year. They will have all receiver parts, cut to ATF spec. No pricing info is available at this time.

Best regards,

David J. Moses
Vice-President
I.O., Inc.
P.O.Box 847
USA - Monroe, NC 28111-0847
Tel: 866-882-1479
Fax: 704-225-8362


-----Original Message-----
From: commander Fritz
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:29 PM
To: David Moses
Subject: MG42 kits


i saw on your latest catalog that you had MG42 kits coming back into the country with deact barrels? is this true? do they include all the receiver like you old kits used to. and how much might they be?

thanks -
---

[Bil]

Thanks for going to the source and getting an actual answer[of sorts].It will be interesting to see what gets here. ---bil