MG42 receiver

Anything MG42 related.
Post Reply
pdstout

MG42 receiver

Post by pdstout »

Guys check this out. I wish we could get these. I am so glad our gun laws keep us SAFE!!! Saying guns cause crime, is like pencils cause bad grades!
http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/ ... p?t=259555
P. Stout 07FFL/SOT
blackreichswehr
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:09 am

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by blackreichswehr »

yes safety is the #1 issue pdsstout, this fellow has a problem oiling his piece after use. wonderful in itself thought-nice iron
cow_commander
Stabsunteroffizier
Stabsunteroffizier
Posts: 54
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:23 pm

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by cow_commander »

That's one of those "deactivated" guns, right? I don't understand the difference in European and American laws regarding receivers, how come they need to be destroyed here, but not there where it's more possible to turn them back to working condition?
pdstout

MG42

Post by pdstout »

It all comes back to trust! If the countries that allow this type of demill, tells its people not to make it live they do not. In the US, the Government knows its subjects will rob a 7-11 with a rebuilt MG42, so they make it harder to rebuild. Just enforce the laws we have (Do NOT make new laws!)
Cpt_Kirks

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by Cpt_Kirks »

If Heller goes our way, it could be a WHOLE new ballgame.

As in, NO Federal gun laws.

No NFA, no GCA, no nothing!

:)
bolex
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:25 pm
Location: Mississippi

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by bolex »

There is a different thought process in Europe, that is the government gives you permission to do/own everything. Goes back to the time where the kings owned everything and gave to the peasants.

In the US the goverment regulates us by saying "NO", we have the right to do anything (constitution) until some regulation/law is made. Some things were spelled out (Bill of Rights) to limit the government regulation/control. We do not (should not) ask permission to own firearms, it is already our right, the government can regulate but not forbid firearm ownership.

It will be interesting what comes out of the court case.

My two cents
User avatar
flemgunner
Brigadegeneral
Brigadegeneral
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:35 am
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by flemgunner »

Im going to bet that alot of people on both sides will be disappointed when the S. court rules. I see em saying something like "militia's are state run, so we leave this to the individual states to enact gun laws." So the federal laws may go away but the states will immediately enact all current laws at the state level. Of course if a state fails to enact these laws the federal gov will do the old withholding highway funds till the state does. That is how all states got a 21 yr drinking age. La was the last hold out but lost out on alot of $$ till they changed to 21.
Glenn
blackreichswehr
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:09 am

Re: MG42 receiver

Post by blackreichswehr »

the inception of the militia, it was a conscious act to volunteer, knowing full well you were under no obligation and could remove yourself at any time,ie farmers returning to their fields. the national guard wasn't formed until the begining of the last century, it in no way operates as a militia and is under the direction of the standing army and the governer of the state were units are centered. plan simple wording our forefathers dictated . the militia are the people at general, unbound, but at the ready
Post Reply