Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Anything MG34 related.
Bil
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 4873
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Brookline,VT

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by Bil »

Too late! If they ever decide that they want to look at my computer for any intent,they will already know what I intend.Pictures on my computers will be the least of the worries at that point.I 'intend' to look at the pictures. ---bil
"I dream of a world where I can buy alcohol,tobacco and firearms from the same drive-up window,and use them all on the way home from work!" Dogbert
User avatar
longhorn109
Oberstleutnant
Oberstleutnant
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:10 pm
Location: UK

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by longhorn109 »

I am pretty sure the ATF don't have jurisdiction in the UK, yet!

I was told about a live MP40 that a dealer in deac guns found in a flea market. He bought it and VERY quickly got it to a fire arms dealer who presented it to the police. They checked it out for criminal use and when it came back clean it was given back to the fire arms dealer for deactivation. If they guy the was selling it had been caught with it he would have got 5 years. An old lady recently went to prison because she took her deceased husbands war trophy pistol to the police station!!!!!
The only thing that helps me maintain my slender grip on reality is the friendship I share with my collection of singing potatoes.
12thWaffenSS

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by 12thWaffenSS »

longhorn109 wrote:I am pretty sure the ATF don't have jurisdiction in the UK, yet!

I was told about a live MP40 that a dealer in deac guns found in a flea market. He bought it and VERY quickly got it to a fire arms dealer who presented it to the police. They checked it out for criminal use and when it came back clean it was given back to the fire arms dealer for deactivation. If they guy the was selling it had been caught with it he would have got 5 years. An old lady recently went to prison because she took her deceased husbands war trophy pistol to the police station!!!!!
It doesn't sound like they need the ATF in the UK. You have harsher laws as it is. However, I'll still be out that way in a month or so.

My English brother in law is amazed at the rights that Americans have when it comes to gun ownership here.
12thWaffenSS

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by 12thWaffenSS »

Bil wrote:Too late! If they ever decide that they want to look at my computer for any intent,they will already know what I intend.Pictures on my computers will be the least of the worries at that point.I 'intend' to look at the pictures. ---bil
I know a guy who makes machine guns all the time using only a rat tail file, some string and a piece of bubble gum. :)
User avatar
CRUSADER
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:13 pm
Location: East Coast

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by CRUSADER »



My English brother in law is amazed at the rights that Americans have when it comes to gun ownership here.
See what socialism has done to their minds? The poor bastards are barely cognisant of the fact that they are living under the boot!

"Rule, Britannia" ... "Britons never will be slaves" ... yeah, my ass.

What the hell happened to them over there?

God help them... :(

God help us all!!
User avatar
www.Prussia.us
General
General
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by www.Prussia.us »

It is wise to be cautious, especially in the field of possessing semi-beltfed guns since the case law is kind of murky at best, but you really should be okay with the pictures.

Kind of like a priest with a GAP Kids catalog on his hard-drive, no "intent" but it would raise lots of questions :lol:

I would however strongly recommend that anyone with an Mg34 receiver on the workbench have Pirate’s semi-tutorial printed up and near the area. As for the poor bidder (who did not make the reserve before the auction was pulled) now he may have some explaining to do as to intent :shock:
“… corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, … until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

- Abraham Lincoln (Republican), Nov. 21, 1864
garyd
Offizieranwärter
Offizieranwärter
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 5:47 pm
Location: goldsboro north carolina

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by garyd »

how can they prove when the cuts were done just say it was an early demill cant prove other wise
User avatar
IMBLITZVT
General
General
Posts: 1160
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:48 am
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Probably Illegal MG-34 Receiver on Gunbroker

Post by IMBLITZVT »

12thWaffenSS wrote: DO NOT DOWNLOAD THE PHOTOS. If the ATF(E) ever seizes your computer and finds those pics, that could easily be viewed as "constructive intent" to build a machine gun.
Not worth it.
I do hope you were joking about pictures being constructive intent. Thats like Pictures of women being intent of rape.

As far as the above post about when the cuts were made. There are some out there that say anything not cut to current regs are illegal MGs. I don't buy that but it may not stop the ATF from saying so. Then again the old dewats were not considered MGs until the ATF decided to considered them so and if not registered are total illegal, even if they were perfectly legal at the time.
Post Reply