Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Anything MG42 related.
Post Reply
navygunner72

Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by navygunner72 »

All-

I recently purchused a MG42 receiver section with just a 4 digit number electro penciled on the left rear section? Left top rear has eagles stamped on top though...just never seen one with only a number stamped...any help is greatly appreciated. All the others I have a MG42 and/or dfb...and so on...Not sure what I'm buying?

Thanks!
User avatar
www.Prussia.us
General
General
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by www.Prussia.us »

Could you perhaps supply a picture?
“… corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, … until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

- Abraham Lincoln (Republican), Nov. 21, 1864
User avatar
gdmoore28
Brigadegeneral
Brigadegeneral
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:59 am
Location: Arkansas Delta

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by gdmoore28 »

www.Prussia.us wrote:Could you perhaps supply a picture?
Ditto.

It will be all but impossible to help you out without good, clear pics of the receiver and stampings in question.


[(O)]

GeeDeeEmm
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government . . . . When the people fear their government there is tyranny, when the government fear the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson
navygunner72

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by navygunner72 »

Hope these help...gold color is from flash...

Thanks in advance for any help!
Attachments
RBack.jpg
FRight.jpg
MG 42 Rear receiver top markings copy.jpg
LBack.jpg
PvtJoker

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by PvtJoker »

That, if I had to venture a guess, LOOKS like a wartime MG-42 that has been rearsenaled and had the numbers and ID marks ground off and force-matched to the new one. As to who might have done it, it could be any number of places. Maybe the East Germans, maybe the Russians, maybe some guy named Fred in a warehouse in New Jersy. No telling, really. But look on the bright side- you DO HAVE an MG-42 receiver, period. Post war Yugos were not waffenamped.
User avatar
www.Prussia.us
General
General
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by www.Prussia.us »

NavyGunner72,

Looks like a nice receiver, the other tell-tail sign is the taper of the ventilated barrel shroud. The M53 tends to have a more graduated taper going down the towards the boaster from the caming piece, whereas the MG42 has a fairly abrupt taper.

She looks like a nice receiver.

Pvt Joker is right, at this point it would take the powers of Kreskin to figure out who put those numbers there and scrubbed the old ones. I would guess Yugoslavia, but that is just a guess. Either way it looks like it is on its way to a new life :D
“… corporations have been enthroned, and an era of corruption in high places will follow, … until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

- Abraham Lincoln (Republican), Nov. 21, 1864
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

Late war MG 42 usually have a assembly code and a date code. Sometimes the manufactures code of the receiver is there as well if different from the assemblier...That being said, with nothing else other than a SN it's a WWII made receiver that was later used by the West german Army as MG1, MG2 gun. They ground the left side marking to varying degrees and sometimes the top waffenamps...Most receivers you can still see parts of the markings...

Here are a few examples....Notice the bottom receiver section..the SN is stamped NOT etched like normal. You can see part of the old number inside the bottom of the 5...

Image

Below is the same reciever in whole...notice the tool marks towards the front section, as they approach the rear of the receiver the finish gets shiney smooth...an indication of grinding/polishingImage




Below is a perfect example of a receiver "scrubbing"..you can still see the assembliers code "swj" which tells us Steyr made this in 1944-45. There should be a date code and or MG42 and DEFINITELY a SN etched in the same manner as the assembliers code but it is missing. This was demilled as a 7.62x51 MG3 kit..notice the West German Army eagle and 84 date code under it. (Stamped)

Image

Below is the same reciever on top. The Waffenamps have been "scrubbed" but if you know where to look they are still visible (partially) Look EXACTLY between the two rivets to the left and right on the outer edge of the receiver and you can see numbers/marks..the eagles are all but gone, but the inspector code number is still visible.
Image

Image
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

EDIT button would be nice... :?


This is one of my favorites...(soon to a members kit!)

You can see the way the MG42 was ground away but not totally....You can see numbers inside the new SN....It's ALL still there, just ground down. This was a MG3 kit as well. Waffenamps on top were UNTOUCHED. Someone got lazy "scrubbing" these or proud of their origins...

Image

Below is the same section but I used a sharpie pen to highlight the markings!

Image

NOTICE how sloppy the markings are..they look electro-penciled in...some Assembliers (there is a difference between who MADE the receiver shell and who put it all together) Used very high quality etching machines, others scratched them in. POST WAR receivers are STAMPED...
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
User avatar
gdmoore28
Brigadegeneral
Brigadegeneral
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:59 am
Location: Arkansas Delta

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by gdmoore28 »

Bullwinkle --

Thanks for the info!

Nothing brings clarity like nice, clear pictures.

GeeDeeEmm
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government . . . . When the people fear their government there is tyranny, when the government fear the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

Looking for the edit button... :oops:

Notice the date has been almost completely erased at the top of the last picture but you can still see the top of the 9 and part of a 4...sharpie missed that one!
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
navygunner72

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by navygunner72 »

Lots of good info!!! Thanks for educating me! I'll have to post some of my other MG42 projects...and receiver pieces
Bil
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 4873
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Brookline,VT

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bil »

Thanks for the pics and info,Bullwinkle! On receiver 5511 you can also see BH-Bundes Heere-post-war German army markings.Some on the markings were real nice and neat,some put on by a kindergarten class.I always wondered how they stamped some of the small parts without damaging them.The stamps must be real strong and sharp.Has anyone seen one of the actual stamps used? ---bil
"I dream of a world where I can buy alcohol,tobacco and firearms from the same drive-up window,and use them all on the way home from work!" Dogbert
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

Bil, you must be a glutton for punishment!!!! :mrgreen: You want STAMPS.."We don't need no stinkin' STAMPS.." or maybe they do. Here are just a few!


Booster area
Image

This is a good one.. ONLY found on right rear recievers of demilled MG3 kits...NEVER seen on original MG42 kits...What I mean by this is the left side markings are always "scrubbed" when you find this on the rightside.
Image

The "X" is also on MG3 demilled, never on original MG42 kits...NOTICE also the stamped dates..97 (something unreadable in center) and 56...probably dates the receiver was rebuilt into MG1/2 and MG3 configuration but a just a guess on my part.
Image

A pistol grip...the most stamps on grip I've run across...
Image

Grip panel..a little off topic but good to stress the GERMAN need to stamp/date/proof everything possible...
Image

Again, another good one for the UBER STAMPER crowd...
Image

Bil....don't get me started!!!! :lol:
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

Okay...a little expansion of previous comments.. Just because a receiver has a manufacture Code etched on the side the receiver like the receiver (M.U. on top for Gustloff-Werke Suhl . "CRA" on lower one which stands for Maget. The GH at top is a date code 1943), Maget or Gustloff may (or may NOT) have actaually pressed, folded and welded the receiver. Sometimes the actual MANUFACTURE of the receiver flat was done by a SUBCONTRACTOR. In that case a STAMP was placed on the lower left of the receiver markings to indicate who actually made the shell.
Image

Phelps 7th GOLD MEDAL break....


The "arz" stamp (and this one of the few STAMPS on the rear leftside of WWII recievers you'll find, "rea" is another) is the maker of the receiver, who turned it over to Gustloff for building into a completed gun.
Image

Several maufatures built MG42's from scratch so most markings do not have a stamp to indicate a seperate maker of the receiver.
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
User avatar
gdmoore28
Brigadegeneral
Brigadegeneral
Posts: 719
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:59 am
Location: Arkansas Delta

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by gdmoore28 »

Quote from Bullwinkle: ["Bil....don't get me started!!!!"]



Awwwww . . . Come on, Bullwinkle -- get started :D There's a large number of us stamp-lovers out here!

I'll also restate Bil's question: Does anybody possess or has anybody seen one of the original stamp die? Like Bil, I suspect that they must have been extremely sharp to avoid destroying the tiny little parts they were sometimes used on.

Military Minutiae -- you gotta love it.

GeeDeeEmm
" The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government . . . . When the people fear their government there is tyranny, when the government fear the people, there is liberty." Thomas Jefferson
Bil
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 4873
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Brookline,VT

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bil »

I meant the actual tool to make the stamp! :lol: It is like the diferance between a foot and a footprint! :? But thanks for the pics of the footprints,er,I mean stamp-prints! ---bil
"I dream of a world where I can buy alcohol,tobacco and firearms from the same drive-up window,and use them all on the way home from work!" Dogbert
PvtJoker

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by PvtJoker »

That's VERY interesting. I was wondering about the "rea" stamp on my 42. Who was "rea"?

<img src="http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i78/J ... C00713.jpg">
PvtJoker

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by PvtJoker »

Image

Try that again... (Man, I DO wish we could edit our posts sometimes.)
User avatar
Bullwinkle
Stabshauptmann
Stabshauptmann
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Sunny South

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by Bullwinkle »

PvtJoker,
Yours is a Gustloff-Werke receiver made in 1945, hence the "svq" code. The "bpr" is Grossfus, unforetunately, I don't know who "rea" is although I have several with the seperate markings.
Mess with the Bull and you'll get the HORNS!
42rocker
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:03 pm
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: Florida

Re: Need help ID'ing this receiver piece

Post by 42rocker »

A Great old tread with info on side markings and some of the other markings.

Later 42rocker
Post Reply