Bi pod let down

Tripods, ammo cans, gunners kit, etc.
Post Reply
usmc8488
Leutnant
Leutnant
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:36 am
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: San Diego

Bi pod let down

Post by usmc8488 »

I recently purchased this bi-pod on GB to replace my post war Yugo. My bid was much higher than the price I paid as no one bid against me. I knew from the photos it was missing the clip for the retaining pin for the bi pod legs and one hole in the legs was damaged. (I did receive exactly what was in the photos)

What did I miss here?
What was in the add
Description
Description
GG BiPod 4a.jpg
GG BiPod 3a.jpg
I pulled it apart and this is what I found.
IMG_0201.JPG
IMG_0197.JPG
IMG_0203.JPG
Non magnetic
Non magnetic
Non magnetic
Non magnetic
What I think is German WWII
What I think is German WWII
The non-magnetic parts seem to be some type of pot metal. lucky for me the final price with shipping was under $100 and didn't reach my max bid.

is there a thread on bi-pods that I missed
Thanks
anjongni
Oberstleutnant
Oberstleutnant
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:31 am
Anti-spam: Mg42

Re: Bi pod let down

Post by anjongni »

The consensus is that the simplified bipods were among the last to be produced during the War, out of whatever was still available.
They are described in Folke's first book on page130.
"Later, the MG42 bipod was redesigned and simplified...."
He mentions that the studs that hold the bipod open were "troublesome".
Of course, when the Yugoslavs re-tooled for their production of the M-53, they copied the German "adjustable" MG42 bipod.
My MG42 receiver is marked "PJ" much like the bipod leg.
The part number doesn't look like the typical Yugoslav "S-....." we see on their parts.
I think you have a rare one. Congrats...Phil
Post Reply