MG34 rewelds

Ask your build questions here. Welding, assembly, etc.
perro

Post by perro »

meant to give you this link instead

http://www.99main.com/~heavymg/TSMGTools.html

shows pics of the C shaped broach bushing as well
smoggle

Post by smoggle »

You will need to
Last edited by smoggle on Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
762x51
Oberst
Oberst
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Post by 762x51 »

smoggle wrote:I beleive they use a Phil. Ord. receiver.
Hi "Smoggle"

TNW makes their own receiver because they tried to broach a Phili. Ord. receiver and it couldn't withstand the force required to broach the keyways. TNW has an outside shop "hog" the basic profile and then the first step in TNW's shop is to broach the keyways. They then complete the remaining profiling and machining.

A little info on TNW's MG42 -

The rear of the receiver, from the "trunion" back is machined by TNW in two halves and welded together. The receiver is original MG42 (or MG53) from the "Trunion" forward.

The fire control group is a "linear" striker with no hammer. There is no extension on the back of the bolt and the recoil spring is not modified from the original.

Regards,
Orin
"It is well that war is so terrible -- lest we should grow too fond of it." Gen. R.E. Lee CSA
Skype ID: ACE1100
User avatar
Reichpapers
Brigadegeneral
Brigadegeneral
Posts: 678
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:55 pm
Location: Reading, PA

Post by Reichpapers »

I'm suprised nobody went that route in the first place...that method would utilize the original sear to release the firing pin....what I don't understand is how something that is barely altered would be approved...so you do the bolt mods, the bolt block and make the pistol grip sear snasp down after pressing the trigger...anything else?
It's better to be silent and considered a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.
Karbinator

Post by Karbinator »

762x51 wrote:
smoggle wrote:I beleive they use a Phil. Ord. receiver.
Hi "Smoggle"

TNW makes their own receiver because they tried to broach a Phili. Ord. receiver and it couldn't withstand the force required to broach the keyways. TNW has an outside shop "hog" the basic profile and then the first step in TNW's shop is to broach the keyways. They then complete the remaining profiling and machining.

A little info on TNW's MG42 -

The rear of the receiver, from the "trunion" back is machined by TNW in two halves and welded together. The receiver is original MG42 (or MG53) from the "Trunion" forward.

The fire control group is a "linear" striker with no hammer. There is no extension on the back of the bolt and the recoil spring is not modified from the original.

Regards,
Orin
So TNW's semi 42 is an open bolt, Slam firing, single shot?
User avatar
762x51
Oberst
Oberst
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:31 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Post by 762x51 »

Karbinator wrote: So TNW's semi 42 is an open bolt, Slam firing, single shot?
That's not what I said at all - but - If that's the way you read it - OK... :D

Orin
"It is well that war is so terrible -- lest we should grow too fond of it." Gen. R.E. Lee CSA
Skype ID: ACE1100
User avatar
Pirate
General
General
Posts: 1212
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: 1/2 mile from the beach in S Fla.

Post by Pirate »

I looked at a 34 cut receiver today and it looks like doing a reweld is possible. it will
involve some milling to clean up some areas and making some insert parts but it does
look like it is doable. A mandrel with copper inserts would have to be made to align
the parts and hold them securely. it would also be best to use as many parts from 1
receiver as possible. This is not a project for an inexperienced welderor / average home
builder though. the main problem will be to compensate for linear and axial shrinkage
of the welds, as they will be thick, and some areas will require more filler than others.
since the cost of a semi receiver is very high it seems like it would be worth the time
and expense to try.
BELTLEAD

Metal Shaper

Post by BELTLEAD »

A old fashioned metal shaper would help cut the internal railways for the MG34 bolt if using a Phila. Ordnance or a re-welded receiver.Attach a boring bar to the shaper.I just missed buying a benchtop shaper for only $350.
BELTLEAD

Picture of a benchtop metal shaper

Post by BELTLEAD »

This is the machine we need for cutting the internal railways of the receiver
Attachments
metal shaper picture.JPG
metal shaper picture.JPG (161.47 KiB) Viewed 1641 times
User avatar
Pirate
General
General
Posts: 1212
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:32 pm
Location: 1/2 mile from the beach in S Fla.

Post by Pirate »

I have seen those receivers and they require a lot of work to complete. first the ID needs
to be bored out, then the bolt recesses need to be broached, there is a lot of metal to
remove and it all needs to be precision. This is a major machining operation requiring
a big lathe and equipmnet to make and operate a broach.
For those who want to do thier own receiver the most realistic approach is to get a cut
receiver and reweld / reconstruct it or get overlapping sections and reweld.
User avatar
TOM R
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
Posts: 3355
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:11 pm
Anti-spam: Mg42
Location: ESCAPED FROM Nazi Jersey, !!!

Post by TOM R »

hey my machinist has one of those shapers :shock:
Great men are born in fire, it is the privilege of lessor men to light the flame, no matter the cost


FOR M60 GOTO http://WWW.M60MG.COM
nra lifer
mvpa 31698
46 cj2a
54 m37
56 CJ3B U.S. Navy
t24/m29 weasel
BELTLEAD

Post by BELTLEAD »

I have the big lathe but I have to fix it.They sell a broaching attachment for my Bridgeport but when one was available used, the machinery store near me wanted $900 for it.
Attachments
lathe1.JPG
lathe1.JPG (47.9 KiB) Viewed 1593 times
Last edited by BELTLEAD on Sat Oct 08, 2005 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BELTLEAD

Mill

Post by BELTLEAD »

Bridgeport
Attachments
mill1.JPG
mill1.JPG (41.23 KiB) Viewed 1592 times
Post Reply